The Fall of "Cool Britannia" and the Rising Korean Wave

Transcript.

Download • 120KB

Vocab Trainers.

Download • 66KB

Flashcards: click here

[00:00:00.000] - Oliver (Host)

Britain was recently the coolest country in the world for a few short years, maybe! It's probably safe to say that that's not the case anymore. Nothing lasts forever, after all. But for a period in the mid to late 1990s, Cool Britannia's culture spread across the globe. It extended across the world in the same way as, say, South Korea's culture is spreading today. Today as part of the so-called Korean wave. The question is, why didn't Cool Britannia last? And what's next for Korea and K-pop?

[00:00:41.480] - Oliver (Host)

Welcome to English and Beyond, the podcast for intermediate learners who want to improve their English through interesting and unusual ideas, stories, cultural snippets, etc. You'll find the full and accurate transcript for this episode, as well as interactive flashcards and vocabulary trainers to help you remember the language you hear on our website, morethanalanguage.com.

[00:01:05.840] - Oliver (Host)

My name is Oliver. I'm an English teacher. And today, we're talking about Cool Britannia and how a cultural movement can change the way the world sees a Country.

[00:01:17.070] - Oliver (Host)

The movement in question, Cool Britannia, wasn't just a minor cultural moment for the UK. It was visible everywhere. In the 1990s, British pop music rose to the top of global charts, with artists like Oasis, Blur, and especially the Spice Girls, breaking records. In fact, the Spice Girls are still the best-selling girl group of all time, with over 100 million records sold worldwide.

[00:01:47.980] - Oliver (Host)

Similarly, British cinema in the 1990s wasn't just local. It was widely seen and talked about around the world. British films were achieving real global success. Four Weddings and a Funeral became one of the most successful British films ever, and launched Hugh Grant as an international star, while edgier films, that is, more controversial films, like Trainspotting, captured a raw, contemporary British edge that critics and audiences took note of, that they noticed. Alongside those films, rom-coms like Notting Hill and Bridget Jones's Diary turned a very British sense of humour and type of character into huge global box office hits. At the same time, British visual art was attracting global attention through the artistic movement, Young British Artists, with figures like Tracey Emin and Damian Hirst, shaping international conversations about modern art. So for a few years, British culture didn't just travel well - it competed directly with American cultural power and often held its own.

[00:03:07.120] - Oliver (Host)

And all of that artistic success was closely connected to a newfound British pride. These musical acts, for example, were not at all embarrassed to be British and to use the British flag in their costumes and branding. The British art scene had created an image that felt young, fun, confident, and maybe slightly reckless, that that is slightly foolish, slightly incautious. This was an image that extended to the British people in general. In the eyes of many people around the world, Brits were creative, yes, but hard drinking, hard partying, and totally unapologetic about it. 1990's girl power with the Spice Girls and the arrival of the Ladettes, the female counterpart of British lads, of British young men, these cultural moments pushed back against ideas of how young women should behave. And so, for a few years, Britain sounded confident, funny, modern, and very sure of itself. And then, slowly, the hangover arrived, like it always does.

[00:04:16.960] - Oliver (Host)

But before we get to that part, where had this Cool Britannia movement come from? Well, let's talk about the context in the country at that time. By the mid-1990s, Britain was coming out of a long period of a right-wing government under the Conservatives Party. After almost two decades, 20 years of the same party in government, there was a widespread, a widely felt sense of political fatigue, of boredom and exhaustion with the political status quo. Figures like the then Prime Minister, the conservative John Major, came to symbolise that mood.

[00:04:57.120] - Oliver (Host)

After the uncompromising Margaret Thatcher, who was the previous Prime Minister, the previous PM, he was considered, at best, deeply unexciting. Many people, including some lifelong Conservative voters, simply felt that the country needed a change. So this was the political context in which Cool Britannia emerged. The cultural energy behind the movement developed largely outside of politics, driven by music, fashion, magazines, film, and art. These were young urban and international creative industries, and they tended to be more left-leaning, more left-wing, than the population as a whole. For example, Tracey Emin, who I mentioned earlier, accused the previous PM, Margaret Thatcher, of crimes against humanity.

[00:05:47.980] - Oliver (Host)

So when New Labour, the left-wing Labour Party, rebranded for the '90s, when they won the 1997 election, the mood amongst these artists was hugely optimistic rather than cynical, rather than pessimistic. The new government appeared modern, positive, assertive, and in tune, that is, in agreement with the cultural energy already in the air. And once more, it made a conscious effort to support this new cultural moment. Crucially, New Labour hadn't created Cool Britannia. It had, in fact, as I said, begun under the Conservatives. But New Labour did coincide with, work with, and benefit from this moment that already existed.

[00:06:37.740] - Oliver (Host)

At that early stage, political involvement didn't feel like interference exactly, because politics seemed to be catching up with culture, not trying to control it. And so, for a short time, culture led and politics followed, and Britain's cool new image felt coherent, like it made sense rather than something forced. However, once New Labour was firmly in power, the mood began to change in ways that were probably unavoidable. The early optimism of 1997 quickly gave way to the realities of governing: difficult decisions, compromises, and the simple fact that actually running a country is much less exciting and fun than just promising to renew it. As that happened, the cultural moment that had felt fresh and rebellious in the mid '90s, began to lose some of that energy. Furthermore, the relationship between culture and power became more visible. Pop stars, designers, and artists were invited into 10 Downing Street, the location of the Prime Minister's office and home. And what had once felt organic, authentic, young, and of course, cool, well, it all started to look quite performative, part of this establishment, and even part of the powerful political class.

[00:07:58.860] - Oliver (Host)

At the beginning, this didn't seem like a huge problem. The government was popular. The country wanted to believe in a modern image of itself, and politics appeared to be celebrating culture rather than controlling it. But gradually, the balance shifted. Cool Britannia stopped being something that people instinctively recognised as a hard to define feeling of very relaxed national pride. And instead, it started becoming something that was identified, named, and repeatedly utilised by the political class. And that, arguably, marked the beginning of the end. Because whatever Cool Britannia had been, it certainly wasn't supposed to be politicians trying to participate in it, trying to become cool by association. It seems unsurprising that the moment a cultural identity starts to receive official approval, it stops being cool. What is less cool than government after all? And so, that was the end of Cool Britannia, another casualty of the political world.

[00:09:04.040] - Oliver (Host)

Now, interestingly, over the last decade in the English-speaking West, we've seen a similar cultural explosion coming from South Korea, the so-called Korean Wave. Korean pop music, television, film, and fashion have travelled globally at a scale that feels familiar. And for many people today, South Korea is simply: cool. Artists like BTS and Blackpink have become global superstars. Korean dramas, like Squid Game, built huge international audiences, and Korean cinema, like Parasite, began winning major international awards, while other examples, like K-pop Demon Hunters and its signature song, Golden, have won over huge international audiences. In soft power terms, that is in terms of the impact of cultural exports, this looks like Cool Britannia all over again. But there is a crucial difference.

[00:10:01.720] - Oliver (Host)

But before we get there, if you're enjoying this podcast, please subscribe or leave a review. You help the podcast to grow, and that allows me to carry on producing new episodes and helping you with your English.

[00:10:13.260] - Oliver (Host)

So unlike Cool West Virginia, which began entirely outside of politics, the Korean wave has developed in an environment where the South Korean state has actively supported cultural industries as part of a national strategy. Government entities like the Korea Creative Content Agency, exist specifically to promote Korean content abroad. Budgets for cultural exports have been increased over time, and official plans even explicitly aim to make Korea a global, pivotal state of culture. It's interesting because a lower level of state involvement in the UK quickly killed off Cool Britannia. But in Korea, this governmental focus - funding, agencies, strategic export support - so far, it hasn't. One reason, at least from a Western point of view, may be distance. For international audiences, South Korea has been linguistically and geographically far enough away that the cultural products arrived in the West without their political and social context.

[00:11:19.880] - Oliver (Host)

We consume the music, the films, the aesthetics, but not the system behind them. We don't link K-pop to the Korean government, and we aren't really aware of the government's policies in general. And I think that that distance makes it easier to accept a polished, carefully-produced image without questioning it too closely. But that distance is shrinking. As global audiences become more familiar with Korean culture, I've seen that conversations are starting to change. People are starting to talk about the darker sides of the Korean system: the factory-like nature of K-pop training, the strict control over artists' lives, sexism, legal battles, and the impact of the #metoo movement translated into Korean culture. In other words, as the image of the country becomes more familiar, it also becomes more complicated. And that brings us to an important question: is South Korea still in the early exciting phase of cultural soft power development, or are we beginning to see the moment when admiration is turning into scrutiny?

[00:12:30.240] - Oliver (Host)

When we consider the future of the Korean Wave, Cool Britannia reminds us that cultural power is fragile. It's easy to break. '90s Britain showed us that true coolness can't be designed by government diktats, by government order, and it can't be controlled for long.

[00:12:48.600] - Oliver (Host)

It emerges when a country feels confident enough to experiment, and it fades when that confidence turns into an inauthentic political performance. South Korea may be at a different stage of the same process, or it may be showing us a new model of soft power that works precisely because it is so well-planned. Either way, the truth is this: nothing can stay cool forever. The only question is how long it can keep going.

[00:13:17.020] - Oliver (Host)

So, listener, what do you think? Do you remember Cool Britannia? What do you think of the Korean Wave? And has your country ever had its own cultural cool moment? Share your opinions with me and practise your English as you do so. See you next time, and thank you for listening!